COVID-19 Pt. 4: The “Test” That Changed The World is Deeply Flawed
It’s hard to imagine that a single test could change the world so drastically, especially when the test itself is riddled with problems. Scientists are calling for the retraction of the original protocol used in the Covid-19 tests . The New York Times even raised red flags about it, and Dr. Anthony Fauci himself has said that if the cycle threshold is set too high, it will pick up dead nucleotides, which causes false positives. Once people understand that one of the biggest reasons why 90% of those who test positive have no symptoms, is because the tests themselves were not developed with accurate science, the world will be infuriated. These numbers are being used as the pulse of our society, and when deaths from other causes, who test positive for Covid, are being counted in the death toll and lockdowns are being based on this, it is criminal.
Part one of this 5-part report explained the reality of Covid hospitalizations, the falsehoods, and the hyperbole, when in fact there were far more hospitalizations from the flu season of 2017-2018. Part two exposed how the CDC is hiding and manipulating the death toll, in large part, through grouping deaths under “PIC” which represents pneumonia, influenza, and covid. Part three not only broke down the true nursing home and long term care facilities data points, but showed how they are documenting anyone who tests positive at time of death as a Covid death, even if they died from another cause such as a gunshot wound. Dr. Deborah Birx from the White House Covid Task Force stated this herself.’
• The task force for emergency diagnostic tests and EUA’s was formed 10 months prior to Covid hitting the states
• There has never been a sample specimen of the alleged virus purified and isolated
• The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, along with numerous other scientists have always said that PCR should not be used for medical diagnostics
• 90% of Covid-positive people are asymptomatic, indicating high-level false positive
• 54 studies with 77,758 participants finds household secondary attack rate (chance an infected person will infect one or more people at home) is 18% if the index case is symptomatic and 0.7% if asymptomatic, meaning it’s not the “super spreader” they alleged it to be
• Scientists found 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level with consequences for false positive results and are calling for retraction of original protocol for the RT-PCR tests
• Doctors worldwide have spoken out against the alleged pandemic, the RT-PCR tests, and warn of the dangers of vaccines that have not met safety standards
• 36-40% of medical staff in two different surveys say they will not get the vaccines
• Vaccines began rolling out last week and the CDC has already documented 3,150 adverse events and launched probe, and the FDA is investigating anaphylaxis shock and allergic reactions from the Pfizer vaccine
The Task Force for Tests Was Formed Back in February 2019
Is it a mere coincidence that the FDA, CDC, and CMS launched a task force to facilitate rapid availability of diagnostic tests during public health emergencies 10 months prior to Covid hitting the states, or at least that’s how the story goes. Never before has a task force such as this been formed that is specific to expediting the development and distribution of tests. In fact, the clinical laboratory community said that they were uncertain as to how to implement diagnostic tests once they received an EUA (emergency use authorization), and meeting CLIA regulations under an EUA to allow labs to start testing specimens.
“Time and time again, we’re reminded that disease knows no borders. While our globalized world and modern transportation help promote economic prosperity, these features also facilitate the spread of emerging infectious diseases,” said Chesley Richards, CDC’s Deputy Director for Public Health Science and Surveillance.
There Has Never Been A Sample Specimen of SARS-CoV-2
In April 2020, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the CCP “censored those who tried to warn the world, it ordered a halt to testing of new samples, and it destroyed existing samples. The CCP still has not shared the virus sample from inside of China with the outside world, making it impossible to track the disease’s evolution.”
In May, Pompeo said, “China still has not provided samples of the virus to other countries, instead having its scientists share the virus’s genome online in January.”
In July, Pompeo said, “They have destroyed samples; they’ve taken journalists and doctors who were prepared to talk about this and not permitted them to do what nations that want to play on a truly global scale and global stage ought to do: be transparent and open and communicate and cooperate.”
The bottom line is that no one has ever performed a SARS-coV-2 isolation. There is no proof that this alleged virus has ever been purified and isolated, in multiple countries. These tests were not built on a “gold standard.”
Many doctors, medical professionals, and scientists question whether the virus even exists. That’s to say, that the actual small numbers of those who have gotten sick, may have a different virus that is no more threatening than the flu.
RT-PCR Test for Covid-19 and The Scientists Demanding Retraction
“Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.” – Kary Mullis, Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and awarded Nobel Prize for it in 1993
Investigative journalist Celia Farber has interviewed biochemist Kary Mullis in the past, and has extensively covered PCR, the method being used in Covid-19 tests. “PCR, simply put, is a thermal cycling method used to make up to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, making it large enough to study.” This report is critical reading to understand how the PCR method is being used in Covid tests and why Mullins and other scientists have said PCR should not be used for medical diagnostics.
Rather than a doctor listening to the lungs and physically assessing a patient, which is the standard method for clinical medicine, they have created the illusion that this is a highly contagious virus while directing people through drive-thru lines as though you are picking up a burger from McDonald’s, only instead they swab you at arms-length. The visuals they have impressed upon people’s minds is forever stamped with permanent gaslighting. This in turn, has made it very easy to escalate positive “cases” even though 90% of people aren’t even displaying symptoms. Had any of those people visited a physician, they would have been told they were fine and never been tested. Now, testing has become mandatory in nursing homes, hospitals, concerts, some places of business, and airports, which will ultimately continue the rise in positive cases due to false positives from a flawed test.
This is an older clip of Mullis, in his own words, about Dr. Fauci and the scientific world:
The Corman-Drosten PCR protocol for RT-PCR Covid-19 tests was published on January 23, 2020 and is used in an estimated 70% of all PCR test kits worldwide.
This was all based on theoretical sequences of the viral genome without a virus isolate, which till this day, doesn’t appear to exist. On November 27, 2020 an International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences published an external peer review titled ‘Review Report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020,’ documenting 10 major flaws and requesting a retraction.
10 Major Scientific Flaws at The Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences for False Positive Results
- Extremely high concentration of primes making the test non-specific
- Six unspecified wobbly positions introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations
- The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments
- Incompatible annealing temperatures
- A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative
- The PRC products have not been validated at the molecular level
- The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses
- The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no standard operating procedure
- The Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus
- Many severe conflicts of interest
The Threshold: The CDC, WHO, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and The New York Times Want You To Understand How The Tests Work for Covid
In an August 2020 report by the New York Times titled “Your Coronavirus Test is Positive. Maybe it Shouldn’t Be,” they described how the cycle threshold used in tests that determine if a patient is infected, needs to be adjusted, stating “most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus. Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk – akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left.”
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
This was confirmed by White House Covid Task Force Dr. Anthony Fauci just one month prior, in an interview (4-min marker). When asked “Can we use a cutoff of viral loads determined by PCR to say this patient is no longer infectious, can go home, go to a nursing facility, because physicians are really having a hard time with that?”
Dr. Anthony Fauci’s response:
“What is now evolving into a bit of a standard that if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. You almost never can culture a virus from a 37 threshold cycle, so if somebody comes in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say its dead nucleotides, period.”
In a landmark legal ruling in Portugal in November 2020, a judge found that “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus,” and added, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present.”
The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
In a December 7, 2020 press release by the World Health Organization (WHO), they admitted to issues with the tests after having received user feedback on elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results.
In this notice, the WHO statedthat “users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result. The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
IMPORTANT NOTE: If it wasn’t clear in all of the above references, different laboratories, states, and countries may have different sensitivity cutoffs. In other words, if they chose to set the cycle cutoff at 33, the rate of Covid-positive would be significantly smaller, and if they adjusted it down even further, it wouldn’t even exist. All of this begins with the swab. Just imagine peeing on a stick to determine if you are pregnant, only they had the ability to make adjustments to where it could show up positive even if you weren’t pregnant. How devastating.
In addition to all of the above, the CDC has already stated that the antibody tests can pick up other strains of coronavirus, meaning someone could have the common cold, and it is being recorded as COVID-19. The antibody tests have created a major conflict in actual test results overall.
After this information went viral in the public eye, the CDC completely reworded their original findings, and changed it to say “Note: Other coronaviruses cannot produce a positive result on a viral test,” while forgetting to alter the sentence preceding it that clearly states “there is a chance that a positive result means you have antibodies from an infection with a different virus from the same family of viruses (called coronavirus). Oops.
Thanks to the WaybackMachine, the original CDC statement shown in the first image is archived here.
Many people have come forward upset that their family members’ deaths were being reported incorrectly on their death certificates. Here is just one example of an individual who died of other causes, tested negative for Covid-19 three times, and yet it was put on their death certificate.
This is not surprising, as hospitals are making a lot of money on this. Becker’s Hospital Review broke down the finances by state back in April.
The High Threshold Creates False Positives
After understanding the section above on the threshold of the tests and how they are creating false positive, which likely explains why 90% of all positive cases are asymptomatic, below are a handful of examples of false/positives that have been reported on.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a Former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of the Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit for Pfizer for 16 years, in addition to consulting with more than 20 biotechnology companies, has said that half or “almost all” of tests for Covid-19 are false positive. Legacy news media immediately jumped on disqualifying Yeadon by pointing to numbers of cases and deaths on Johns Hopkins site, which is hardly a disqualifier. Pfizer declined to comment altogether.
CRITICAL LISTENING
Doctors and Medical Professionals from all over the world have spoken out about Covid-19, the tests, and the vaccines. These professionals put a lot on the line to speak out, providing important information from the USA, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. LISTEN. They strongly worn against the dangers of the vaccines that are an experimental product, putting genetic material into humans, which are not proven safe or effective, and could in fact be dangerous.
Governor Ron DeSantis spoke with Dr. Bhattacharya from Stanford Medical School, in a round table discussion about the implications of PCR tests identifying non-infectious, dead virus, and posed the question… “Are we quarantining hundreds of thousands of Americans who are not contagious?”
In Austria, Michael Schneditlz, a member of the Austrian Freedom Party, showed how coca-cola tested positive for Covid during an Austrian National Assembly.
The “Asymptomatic Super Spreader” Farce with 90% Asymptomatic Rate
It should now be clear as to why 90% of people do not exhibit any symptoms because the threshold is too high on an already flawed test, and these people likely do not have the virus.
Back in April, the Washington Post reported that in upper Manhattan and the Bronx 88% of pregnant patients who tested positive, had no symptoms.
As mentioned previously, the New York Times reported that nearly 90% of confirmed Covid-19 cases in the U.S. could be clinically insignificant and non-contagious.
A study from the University College London (UCL) also concluded that nearly 90% of people who test positive have no symptoms.
The big concern, and propaganda that was pushed all year, is that asymptomatic people could be “super spreaders.” The fact is, the data points to quite the opposite, while the media continues to gaslight. Did they miss the memo on 54 studies, or nah?
New JAMA meta-analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants finds household secondary attack rate (chance an infected person will infect one or more people at home) is 18% if the index case is symptomatic and 0.7% if asymptomatic. That’s less than 1%, but the media refers to them as “super spreaders.”
Despite this, legacy news media such as MSNBC for example, continue to gaslight people with “asymptomatic people are super spreaders” while their guest, Dr. Vin Gupta warns people that “just because you get vaccinated with that second dose doesn’t mean you should be traveling during a pandemic or that you are liberated from wearing a mask until all of us get vaccinated.” He then states that the vaccine may not prevent you from being contagious. So if the vaccine may not keep you from getting infected and you may be contagious either way, then why get the vaccine, especially when the overall survival rate is 99.98%?
The Vaccine Has Officially Been Rolled Out and The Side Effects Are Alarming
Pfizer and Moderna have both been approved by the FDA through the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and not the standard approval process, which are now rapidly rolling out. There have already been reported adverse reactions, and many people are extremely concerned about getting vaccinated, despite the showboat entertainment of high profile people allegedly getting vaccinated on television. The fact that they need to do that to assure people these vaccines are safe, is very telling.
The American Nurses Foundation survey on 13,000 nurses showed that when nurses were asked if they would voluntarily be vaccinated, 34% said yes, 36% said no, and 31% said they were unsure.
A survey at Loretto Hospital in Chicago, where the city’s first Covid-19 vaccine was administered, 40% of the staff said they do not plan to get the vaccine. Many are concerned about how quickly it was developed and the potential side effects.
Meanwhile, in Libertyville, not far from Chicago, they temporarily suspended vaccinations after four team members experienced adverse events.
In Alaska, five healthcare workers suffered anaphylaxis shock after getting the vaccine, despite not being aware of any existing allergies. This came after a report of a medic receiving the vaccine in New York suffering from the same thing and was moved into intensive care.
The CDC has already reported that 3,150 vaccine recipients have reported adverse reactions after being vaccinated. They were “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.” They have already administered 272,001 vaccines as of December 19. The CDC has launched a probe into this and announced that people who have experienced allergic reactions to any ingredients in the Covid-19 vaccines should not get the vaccine, and those who did experience a reaction to the first shot, should not get the second shot. Read full announcement here.
The FDA is now investigating allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine.
In Australia, they had to scrap their $750 million vaccine project because it was causing those receiving it to wrongly test positive with HIV. They are now increasing their orders from Pfizer, Novavax, and AstraZeneca.
It’s also important to note that pregnant women, children, those that are low-risk, and those with allergies should be cautious and due your due diligence in research first.
Potential Side Effects from CDC Site:
Not to be taken lightly, it should be noted that Pfizer has been fined over $4.7 billion since 2000 for false claims acts, off-label or unapproved promotion, Foreign corrupt practices, with over $103 million for “drug or medical equipment safety violations” and over $34 million for “kickbacks & bribery.”
Author’s note: Generally, this is where I would insert a sentence telling people that they should review all of the facts and decide what is best for themselves and their families, but quite honestly, I feel more compelled to warn people of the dangers. I’ve been studying the data all year, and when the same folks that are flat out lying about death counts are also pushing the vaccine, I cannot remain unbiased in my reporting.
In Conclusion
There is a lot of gaslighting, misinformation, intentional disinformation, and data to sift through in order to clearly see the big picture and make proper decisions based on facts. Unfortunately, when information reported goes against the narrative being pushed by big pharma, big media, and big stakeholders, journalists and medical professionals tend to get disqualified in meek attempts by simply pointing to “other sources” that “say otherwise,” without providing solid evidence. It’s nothing more than word salad. When the data is pulled directly from the sources and the facts are laid out, it is undeniable. It’s up to everyone to decide whether they choose to see the facts or the illusion. Those that choose to see the illusion will inevitably cast away their freedoms, which will have a direct impact on the rest of the country. The question is, will they be able to live with themselves when reality sets in and it’s too late to turn back?
Continue to Covid-19 Pt. 5: Psychologists, Scientists and The CIA Tell Us Fear is The Real Killer >>>
Download the complete 5-part report in The Bookshop >>
Corey Lynn
Corey Lynn is an investigative journalist, co-host of the weekly Dig It! podcast, and co-host of The Solution Series. Follow her at coreysdigs.com, on Twitter, Gab, Truth, Rumble, and Telegram. Support her work by becoming a Patron, making a donation or buying a Book.
20 Comments
David
I have a screenshot of a shipping docket for convid test kits from World Integrated Trade Solution that says the test kits were shipped during 2018 long before convid existed. Not sure what to make of it but it looks legit.
Dave from SanAntonio
I’ve been an RRT for approximately 36 years. I have zero plans on taking this vaccine. I’m also formally trained in Allergy/Immunology. There is no way, that I can see, how they developed a vaccine from ‘scratch’…’safely’ in this short amount of time. Strict medical protocols could not have been maintained and as for cutting corners…if this was a box to start with…it’s now a circle as they cut all the corners off. From the start of this we have been fed misinformation, disinformation and outright lies. ‘Fear’ is a powerful tool when used for manipulation and control of a sizable population and ‘fear mongering’ has been the job of the MSM. If you look back and think about it…from around the end of February through July…NO ONE died in this country from anything but COVID, at least according to the ‘experts and the MSM. Money was used as an incentive for a diagnosis of COVID in our nations hospitals, but, of course, that had nothing to do with the abnormally high numbers of COVID cases being reported, did it? By the end of July the list of ‘symptoms’ for COVID basically covers every respiratory illness on earth. By-the-way…what has happened to our yearly flu season? Nothing seen or heard, so…I guess it’s been eradicated. The CDC cannot provide statistics for flu, this year as they don’t have the information. Right on schedule and on cue…for the vaccine rollout…a ‘new’ and more dangerous strain has ‘popped up’. Go figure. The information that we’ve been duped is all out there and ‘if’ you take a little time to think about it…it is very clear.
Maria
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
So what do people think of this study in Nature? 10,000,000 Wuhan Chinese studied and found that asymptotic transmission never happens. Never.
Too good to be true?
miles e drake
The Wuhan biological warfare laboratory that developed the virus was funded by the Obama-Biden regime in 2009. There was a meeting in New York in October 2019 about how to implement the “Great Reset”, attended by Soros, Schwab, Gates, democrat bigwigs and the Chicoms, at which many believe that the final deal to release the virus and collapse the West was sealed. The above is evidence that the plandemic was in operation as early as February 2019, and that the PCR was being prepared for use as the “test” that would panic and shut down the world as Soros and the Red Chinese made their move. Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for developing the PCR, had been increasingly vocal about his concerns regarding overuse and misuse in medical diagnosis and criminal investigation during this period, and he mysteriously and suddenly died in August 2019. We have crossed the line from conspiracy theory to demonstrable conspiracy.
Kara Sanders
I’m a newcomer to Corey’s Digs but couldn’t be more impressed with the compilation of information in this article. I’m a microbiologist with 30+ years in health science education. Government ineptitude aside, the scam that is being fed to the public from the medical community is heartbreaking. If anything positive comes out of this situation it will be an awareness that our health care system in America IS in dire need of an overhaul, just not in the ways people normally think. The Great American Think Tank is no more. Corporate medicine and government oversight has been ruinous.
Nikki
Hi Kara
(Again good work Corey)
If I could advise you of anything, being new here, is it would be best to also check out all coreys reports. She is thorough and not backward in coming forward, saying her piece respectfully, honestly and diplomatically, offering as much proof where possible. (If she did she could be easily forgiven, as we all should be, if you were to find her (or us) ranting in upset or for expressing how she and we really feel, regarding how our fellow human beings are e_vilely treating us)
So brace yourself, cry if need to release that negative energy, breathe in and out prana positive energy there after, focus or meditate on positive future even if for only a couple of minutes and do something light hearted between because it is heavy truth, but we all need to know it, so we can help each other come up with or share solutions in stopping it and support where you/if can.
So if you do read, share her great site, people need to know the truth so they are fully informed to make decisions for themselves and all people. Sharing is caring and strength, power, support and safety in numbers.
Many BLESSINGS to ALL
Namaste
Nikki
Sandy369
We should quit wearing a mask and when someone approaches you, just tell them you got the vaccine and you are safe now. I mean what are they going to say to you? Any thing they have to say will not make sense! Otherwise why would “they” consider getting a vaccine if they don’t work? It absolutely blows away any argument.
Doug
I don’t wear a mask and I agree this is a good way to handle people who think the mask does any good. However, the powers that (shouldn’t) be have already anticipated this argument and are saying that the vaccine only protects you from the virus (even though it doesn’t–just the opposite) but you still carry the virus and can spread it and therefore everyone will have to continue to wear masks, social distance, isolate, and everything else basically permanently from now on, even after vaccination. There will be no end. This has all been planned out for a long time and scripted well into the future. It’s all about a global reset, socialistic takeover, population control/reduction, etc. It never was about a real pandemic or protecting anyone’s health.
Curious
Thank you for the excellent compilation of evidence. I have a couple of corrections and a couple of questions.
1. Correction: In the cited JAMA meta-analysis (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774102), the secondary attack rates of asymptomatic index cases is 0.7%, not 0.007%.
2. Correction: In the cited study on the correlation between PCR-positive and culture-positive samples by Jaafar et al. (https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603), the authors do not say that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.” This quote is from the cited RT article (https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/). In particular, the authors do not use the term “false positive”. Some people claim (in discussion) that those samples are “true positive”, even if “non-infectious” (which sounds absurd).
3. Question: Is there a universally accepted definition of “false positive” for COVID-19 RT-PCR tests? The cited Corman-Drosten external peer review (https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/) says “The definition of false positives is a negative sample, which initially scores positive, but which is negative after retesting with the same test.” This is not satisfying, because it relies on chance rather than some gold standard (culture?).
4. Question: Back to the study by Jaafar et al. (https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603): The authors say they obtain “SARS-CoV-2 isolates”. What are those, if the virus has not been isolated? Do the same authors who show that PCR is unreliable above 35 cycles (including Didier Raoult) claim that the virus has been isolated?
Corey Lynn
1) It’s 0.007% – look at their chart in article. Link is there as well. 2) I was quoting the RT article… that extrapolated from the 3%. 3) “negative sample.” 4) Any “isolates” would have been cultured as opposed to purified and isolated from original specimen.
Curious
Thanks. 1) 0.007 is 0.7%. 0.180 is 18%. 3) “Negative sample”, yes, but how do you know? For instance, is a “culture-negative” (Jafaar et al.) true or false PCR-positive? Any source? Fact-checkers say “true”.
Corey Lynn
Oh gosh, you are right. I just noticed I converted it to a percent and forgot to move the decimal over. Fixed. Thank you. Will look at the other question later. Merry Christmas!
Liam Madden
Hi Corey,
Firstly, I admire the tenacity with which you seek data from the source and don’t just rinse and repeat the regurgitated narratives of either other researchers or the mainstream. Just now, from your work, I learned that the 2018 flu season had 800k hospitalizations! Wow, what a useful reference compared to the 500-600 from CV-19.
I am coming from a place of deep skepticism for the mainstream narrative, and vociferous opposition to lockdown, and have frayed many friendships for it. I would like to offer some friendly feedback your way on two small, but significant portions of the argument made in this series:
1) I have heard time and again from some prominent voices in the questioner community that, “The virus has not been isolated.” Dr Kaufman, Dr Cowan, and Jon Rappaport being the most notable, who claim some version of, “The so-called virus sample came from a lung fluid sample, then went into a culture of monkey kidney cells, and there was no documentation of the step where the cell and virus were isolated from each other before they started looking for genetic material. In order to do that, you’d need to centrifuge the culture and extract the band of viral particles…”
And, to support that line of thought, in your article, you quote Mike Pompeo saying the Chinese never gave us a sample, only a gene sequence.
Well, in fact, the CDC researchers claiming to have isolated the American virus: (CDC study on isolation: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.972935v1.full.pdf)
A) did so with an alleged infected *American* who recently traveled to China as a live source of the alleged virus. So the Pompeo line of argument is largely nullified. You don’t need a live sample from China if you have your own source. And if it matches the genetic sequence of the Chinese, then it is an isolated virus. It would be reasonable to suspect the CDC could just lie and say it matches the Chinese sequence, but it would be hard to fathom the dozens of other universities around the world also being “in” on a scheme to contrive a virus.
Then again, an isolated virus doesn’t necessarily mean they’ve proven that the virus in question CAUSES the relevant symptoms, but that is a separate question.
B) The CDC paper which documents the isolation (which includes MANY non-CDC researchers as co-authors) does say, “Fifty µl of the viral lysate were used for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and
sequencing…”
And ***Viral lysate is defined as an extraction of viral materials through a centrifuging process.*** I’m not sure if Kauffman et al are just not versed well enough in the jargon and missed that, or if the CDC is truly skipping over a critical step. But I have reached out to the author of the CDC paper for clarification and will let you know if they say anything. I have a hard time taking this as evidence to rely on, for or against the claim of isolation
C) BUT, the scale tips towards evidence of it being isolated by the commercial availability of isolated Sars Cov2 viral lysate. (Although it is rather shocking you can buy it, lol)
https://thenativeantigencompany.com/products/sars-cov-2-purified-viral-lysate/
So I think it would strengthen the arguments against lockdown, mandatory vaccines, masks, and hysteria (ie arguments FOR medical freedom and rational public health policy) if we distanced ourselves from the “virus has never been isolated” argument, which seems very weak in light of the above points
And secondly, while you repeatedly, and correctly emphasize that the cause of death has been conflated with pneumonia, flu, or other co-morbidities, and I’m sure that does contribute to the fear mongering, the *mislabeling* of deaths doesn’t account for the all-cause mortality exploding well above expected ranges in the US, Europe and much of the world.
Meaning, even in the graph you displayed, it is readily visible that deaths are going WAY up. Like up enough (well above 200k) to beg the question, “EVEN IF THEY ARE MANIPULATING THE DEATH DATA… WHY ARE SO MANY PEOPLE DYING… IF NOT FROM A NEW VIRUS?” And if there’s alot of people dying from a new virus, focusing on the labels is not a very fruitful area of persuasion, to me. People will still be scared enough to be bullied into lockdown unless you focus less on lying about labels and more on the reasons to have less fear
I don’t think the arguments for medical freedom, rational public health policy, and democracy need to hinge on the logic, “look they’re miscategorizing deaths.” It should hinge on:
A) We can treat the sick (if we stop suppressing viable treatments)
B) We can protect the vulnerable without destroying our economy and psychological well being.
C) The ***RELATIVE RISK*** of covid death is still low, (even with 300k more deaths), and the cost (health, freedom and economic) of lockdowns are incredibly high. We need to rationally compare them.
I really do admire your diligence, clarity, and thoroughness. I offer this feedback as an ally.
Respect and gratitude,
Liam
Allen
It’s clear what happened in 2020 if you consider the chronology.
The key week came in late January when the Chinese went public about the ´Wuhan Virus’ & CEPI (meeting in Davos at the WEF) called for international funding for vaccines even though only 20 dead at that time.
From then on we were on the road towards lockdowns, “social distancing” and other restrictions. Vaccines became the Holy Grail, other treatments were ignored. And to ensure high take up and roll out of the WEF’s Great Reset the restrictions had to continue throughout the year, even in the summer.
Also the figures had to be inflated by reclassification of deaths and ramped up use of PCR tests which gave out high number of false positives. Masks were also mandated in the summer to keep the levels of fear up.
We could and should have been back to normal several months ago and indeed never needed lockdowns in the first place, but ending restrictions would not have helped with vaccine take-up or the implementation of the “Great Reset” so the lockdowns and restrictions (based on false data) continue.
Timeline:
12/30/19- Ophthalmologist Li Wenliang informed professional colleagues by WhatsApp that thereare 7 cases in his hospital that are confirmed positive for SARS.
1/1/20- Christian Drosten from the Charité heard about it and immediately started thedevelopment of SARS viruses before it was even clear or could be clear whether the report from Chinaabout SARS was true and proven before the Chinese virologists published their results. Hetestified that as of January 1, 2020, he had developed a genetic detection method to reliably prove the presence of the new corona virus in humans.
1/21/20- 3 days before the first publication of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention the WHO recommended all nations to use the “safe” test procedure developed by Drosten.
Fact: Drosten used scientifically NOT verified data for his rapidly globalised PRC test of the 2019-nCOV, which was renamed SARS-CoV-2 on February 7, 2020 with the participation of Drosten. The claim that he had a reliable test procedure is completely impossible.
The Drosten PCR test is the foundational protocol for approximately 75% of PCR tests currently being used. In the original Drosten protocol 45 cycles were recommended.
1/23/20- Publication of the development of the test method of Drosten. On page 3 of this article, left column, 8 lines from below, he describes the first and decisive step of his approach:
“Prior to the announcement of public virus sequences from 2019-nCoV cases, we relied on reports in the social media announcing the detection of a SARS-like virus. Therefore, we assumed that a SARS-relatedCoV was involved in the outbreak.”
1/24/20 and 3/220- The authoritative virologists of the Chinese disease authority published their results on 1/24/20 and 2/3/20. They reported the isolation of “many” short gene sequences, which, when strung together, could represent a genetic strand of a new type of virus.
The authors explicitly pointed out (as well as many other virologists involved to date) that the absolutely necessary experiments have not yet been carried out which would make it possible to claim that this is indeed a genetic strand of a pathogenic virus.
Keep in mind that the PCR protocol developed by Drosten is the head of the snake. Once the PCR tests are invalidated the entire swindle dissipates and withers away. Until this happens the “casedemic” can remain in perpetuity.
Keep in mind that Drosten was directly involved in virtually the same manner in the swine flu hoax of 2009- he is the German analog to the UK’s modelling madman Neil Ferguson who, like Drosten, is wrong on all well-funded predictions which have caused incalculable damage to the general public.
Final Note:
The governments of The West know full well that “Covid” is being used as cover for crashing the economies in the Western world. There is not now and never has been a “pandemic”- that is all Kabuki theater to disguise the reality of rapid economic decline brought on by the Ponzi Schemes of financial institutions over the past few decades.
The US (and much of the Western world) is in economic free fall. This was occurring long before Covid was engineered but now it is moving with much greater velocity.The collapse started in 2008 and attempts to salvage this Leviathan have been failures only delaying the inevitable. Fast forward to 2019 and the crisis began to unravel again.
Don
I KNEW IT ! I KNEW IT !!!… Back in January 2020, a Friend sent me a YOU TUBE Link about ” The Great Awaking, The World is About to Change, The Fall CABAL Parts 1-10″, … Then I came across an other video , “JFK to 911… EVERYTHING IS A RICH MAN’S TRICK”. After watching these two DVD’s I purchased on EBAY as YOU TUBE OMITTED Chapter 5 !
I REALIZED that since I was born in 1950,.. entered Grade School in 1956…I have been LIED to my WHOLE ENTIRE LIFE ! PLEASE go to EBAY and purchase these two dvd’s… Only $10.00 each… Both these DVD’s explain ALL about how the Illuminati , Rothchilds, Soros Brothers, Bill Gates, among the OTHER SMALL group of people that RULE the GLOBE have been designing the FALL of the Western World ever since the Pilgrims landed in the USA by even at that time, because AMERICA was in Debt to the ROTHCHILDS due to LOANS !
I have had “a GUT” feeling with the Knowledge I gained from these two DVD’s that this “COVID PANDEMIC” has been the FINAL Step on having Complete GLOBAL Control !!!
With this last “Presidential Election”… and having Joe & Kamala in office, North America is now heading towards SOCIALISM with the”ELITE Group” of people that Control the Globe now in TOTAL Control for their Desires of MORE POWER,WEALTH,and CONTROL of the Whole GLOBE !! They are now in position !!!
I Don’t know Everything, but I do use my Brain to see and now understand what is going on with this “PANDEMIC BS ” !!!
ALL of the above information concurs with my watching the two DVD’s that just by chance I was given a link to watch on YOU TUBE that had the Chapter 5 omitted , being stubborn and hard-headed… I found the Complete
story of “FALL OF CABAL” which I ended up getting the Other dvd… “JFK to911, EVERYTHING IS A RICH MANS TRICK” on EBAY.. I felt as though someone had kicked me in my stomach as I have been LIED to ever since I was born ! There is nothing I can do about it, but just being AWARE helps me understand what is happening with this “GLOBAL PANDEMIC ” BS !!! My apologies on repeating myself, but the Above information just brings everything together and I Really feel sorry for our Future Generation of our Young people today and what is going to be happening with their lives !
Thank You for allowing me to put my 2 cents in… I believe the Western world is in GREAT Trouble !
Sandy369
A video that shows how the SARS outbreak in 2003 is almost exactly the same as Covid 19. They even had a conference like Event 201 a few months before the outbreak. The WHO played their part trying to keep it secret. The similarities are so very obvious.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0n7pIVS3t08
ellie north
Thank YOU Corey for your whole-hearted tenacity.
In March 2021, my brother ordered a home “PCR test kit” from Spectrum Solutions in Draper, Utah.
http://www.spectrum-dna.com
It states on the label affixed to the package:
This kit is designed for the collection of human saliva samples.
For research use only.
Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
I filed a report with the FTC, Federal Trade Commission.
I asked, how can a CV19 diagnosis be given of ‘positive or negative’ with this kit?
No reply, except they received my inquiry.
Corey Lynn
That doesn’t surprise me. It sounds just like the packaging on masks that say they are not meant to prevent you from getting Covid-19. I would love to see a photo of that label and packaging, if you took one? You can email me at [email protected]. Thanks!
Jackie Payette
Does anyone know where I can receive the forms for not having to take the Covid injection? I watched SGT report and he said Corey has this. This is the form for employer and college students. (This was on Before it’s News and he said that there were forms to be had.)
Corey Lynn
Here you go! 😉
Employee form: https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections/
Student form: https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/form-for-students-attending-colleges-or-universities-requiring-covid-19-injections/